Executive teams
- Workflow
- Ask → evidence → draft decision → approval
- Proof
- Source-backed answers, decision drafts, approval queue, audit trail.
- Boundary
- Does not approve or execute decisions for the team.
Pinavia
Pinavia turns institutional evidence into governed AI workflows for executive, board, regulatory, diligence, and advisory teams. The point is not a better chat window. The point is a decision path that carries sources, caveats, ownership, approval status, and proof.
Promise
Every consequential AI output reaches a named human before it becomes an action.
Best first pilot
A regulated workflow where evidence, approvals, and audit readiness already matter.
What changes
AI work becomes source-backed, bounded, routed, and reviewable instead of just fluent.
Product family
Executive teams
Boards and company secretariat teams
Regulated entities and compliance teams
Deal teams and investment committees
Consulting and advisory firms
| Room | Buyer | First workflow | Proof | Boundary |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NexusAI | Executive teams | Ask → evidence → draft decision → approval | Source-backed answers, decision drafts, approval queue, audit trail. | Does not approve or execute decisions for the team. |
| Quorum | Boards and company secretariat teams | Board pack → quorum/conflicts → resolutions → minutes | Board-pack evidence, attendance/quorum signals, conflicts, minutes draft. | Does not replace directors' duties or approve resolutions. |
| Meridian | Regulated entities and compliance teams | Scope → evidence coverage → gap triage → filing pack | Requirement matrix, cited sources, missing-evidence list, caveats. | Does not file, submit, certify, sign, or provide legal advice. |
| Vantage | Deal teams and investment committees | Deal room → coverage → red flags → IC memo | Coverage map, red-flag register, diligence questions, IC handoff. | Does not mark a deal approved, investable, or rejected. |
| Nucleus | Consulting and advisory firms | Firm profile → method package → delivery → assurance | Method pack, deliverable coverage, reviewer queue, white-label controls. | Brand can flex; core trust and approval controls stay fixed. |
Pilot inputs
Pilot outputs
Trust model
Answers cite governed sources or refuse when the source base is too weak.
AI can draft, route, compare, and prepare; humans approve, sign, submit, and decide.
Each vertical owns its objects, stages, buyer language, and refusal boundaries.
Ingestion, evidence, governance, agents, and billing stay common across the product family.
Standing authority boundary
Pinavia can prepare, cite, draft, compare, and route work. It does not approve, sign, file, certify, submit, or make investment decisions. Those verbs belong to named humans.
Pilot package
Use this as a scoping brief, not a fixed quote. Pricing and scope should follow the diagnostic, evidence estate, security needs, and the number of workflows included.
Pilot
90 days
One room, one workflow, one workspace, sponsor/reviewer model, evidence pack, and weekly value proof.
Expansion
Room by room
Add more workflows only after the first path proves evidence quality, adoption, and approval discipline.
Enterprise
Custom
Data residency, connector depth, support/SLA, white-label, and product-domain setup are scoped separately.
Next step
If the workflow is clear, create the pilot workspace. If it is not clear, run the diagnostic first and use the result to choose the room.