Readiness Diagnostic
Move from an AI readiness score to evidence you can defend.
The free assessment shows what your team believes. The diagnostic checks the same seven dimensions against live evidence, recent decisions, named owners, and the obligations that bind your organisation.
Scored readiness assessment
Your organisation scored across the seven dimensions below, with the weakest two identified as the constraint to address first.
Named gaps, not a grade
Each low score returns the specific question a board or a regulator would ask about it, so you know what you cannot currently answer.
A workspace you can invite colleagues into
Each person gets their own login, because a shared login breaks the audit trail that makes any of this defensible. Three seats included before anything changes.
Authority boundary
Pinavia can score, cite, compare, draft, and route findings. It does not certify readiness, provide legal advice, file with a regulator, approve investment decisions, or sign on behalf of your organisation.
The seven dimensions, at two depths
Scoring establishes what your team believes. Evidence testing establishes what is true. Both examine the same seven dimensions, which is why the second follows cleanly from the first.
| Dimension | Self-assessment | Evidence-tested (review) |
|---|---|---|
| Organisational Drag | How many approval steps you believe a decision passes through. | We trace three recent decisions end to end and record where each one actually waited, who held it, and for how long. |
| AI as a Core Function | Where you place AI in the organisation today. | We map current AI use against who owns it, what it touches, and which uses are running without a mandate. |
| Data Readiness | Whether an authorised person can retrieve key data in under an hour. | We attempt the retrieval on a sample of the decision data your leaders actually cite, and time it. |
| Workflow Standardisation | How well you believe critical processes are documented. | We test the documentation against the people who run the process and record what exists only in someone's head. |
| Governance Maturity | Your stated posture on AI oversight. | We check whether an AI output produced last month could be reconstructed today: source, reviewer, approval, and rollback. |
| Regulatory Preparedness | Whether you have mapped obligations to AI deployment. | We map your AI use to the specific instruments that bind you, at clause level, in your jurisdiction. |
| Decision Velocity | How quickly you believe clear intelligence becomes action. | We measure elapsed time from evidence available to action taken on the decisions you nominate. |
When scoring is not enough
Evidence-Tested Readiness Review
Where the self-serve assessment reports what your team believes, this engagement tests it. Two weeks, partner-delivered: three decisions traced end to end, retrieval timed against your real data, and your AI use mapped to the instruments that bind you at clause level.
Duration
Two weeks
Ten working days from kick-off to findings walkthrough. Short enough to approve without a procurement cycle, long enough to test evidence rather than opinion.
Scope
Fixed
Seven dimensions, three traced decisions, one consolidated evidence request. Scope is agreed in the first two days and does not move after that.
How the two weeks run
- 1
Days 1 to 2
Scope and evidence request
We agree the three decisions to trace and the data sample to test, then issue a single consolidated evidence request. No open-ended document trawl.
- 2
Days 3 to 7
Evidence testing
Structured interviews with process owners, retrieval testing against the nominated data, and clause-level regulatory mapping.
- 3
Days 8 to 9
Findings and sequencing
Findings written up against evidence, gaps prioritised, roadmap sequenced with constraints named.
- 4
Day 10
Walkthrough and handover
Findings walkthrough with the sponsor and remediation owner. Pack handed over in final form.
What you receive
Readiness findings pack
Scored assessment across the seven dimensions, each finding tied to the evidence it came from. Written for circulation to a board or an executive committee without translation.
Prioritised remediation roadmap
The gaps ordered by what unblocks the most downstream value, with the sequencing constraints named. This is the document that justifies a phase two internally.
Regulatory obligation map
Your AI use mapped to the instruments that bind you at clause level, with the gaps between current controls and stated obligations marked.
Findings walkthrough
A working session with your sponsor and whoever owns remediation. The purpose is agreement on what is true, not a presentation.
What this engagement is not
- No implementation, configuration, or system build. This engagement establishes what is true and what to do about it.
- No regulatory filing, certification, or submission on your behalf. Findings support your own submissions; a named person in your organisation files them.
- No legal opinion. The regulatory map identifies applicable obligations; it does not substitute for advice from your counsel.
- No vendor selection or procurement support.
What we need from you
- A named executive sponsor with authority to nominate the decisions traced.
- Access to the three nominated decisions and their participants within the first week.
- A named remediation owner present at the walkthrough.
- Response to the consolidated evidence request within three working days.
Start with the score, or go straight to evidence
Most organisations score first. If you already know where the gaps are, scope the review directly.